← Search

James Takahashi

Beaverton, OR
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
140 matches · 101W–39L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add James Takahashi to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history140 matches
W
2026-07-25 · THPRD-Hockman/Takahashi · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lisa Hockman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-07-19 · NWW-LW-Karlin · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lisa Hockman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-07-18 · NWW-LW-Karlin · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lisa Hockman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-07-10 · THPRD-Hockman/Takahashi · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sandi Martes mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 2-6
W
2026-06-14 · THPRD-Hockman/Takahashi · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lisa Hockman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-3
W
2026-05-30 · #1 Doubles · with Lisa Hockman championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-05-20 · #2 Doubles · with Edwin Becker championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-05-17 · NWW-LW-Karlin · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lisa Hockman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 4-5
W
2026-05-09 · NWW-LW-Karlin · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lisa Hockman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-05-03 · NWW-LW-Karlin · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lisa Hockman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-05-01 · NOR-THPRD-Christensen/Keo · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Edwin Becker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-04-23 · NOR-THPRD-Christensen/Keo · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Steven Keo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams31 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.5
41.7%
5W–7L · 49.8% of games
4.0
25%
2W–6L · 34.8% of games
7.0
76.9%
10W–3L · 64.7% of games
8.0
50%
2W–2L · 43.3% of games
6.0mixed
100%
15W–0L · 69.7% of games
7.0mixed
78.3%
36W–10L · 62.4% of games
8.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
55 matches
#2 Doubles
37%
52 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
27 matches
#1 Singles
4%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams