Search

Gerald Chase

Portland, OR
3.5C year-end 2025
93 matches · 52W–41L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.07
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 4 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
19%
down to 3.0
81%
stay 3.5
0%
up to 4.0
Projected to December: 12% down · 88% stay · 0% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.10. Higher than today’s 3.07 because players this far below their band have historically finished nearer the middle of it.

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the bottom of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Portland · 3.5
363 of 399
OR · 3.5
681 of 735

Gerald is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Teams67 teams · 2004–2026
MPRC-Agnihotri/Atkins
2026 Adult 40 & Over · 3.5 Men
2026
MPRC-Atkins
2026 Adult 65 & Over · 7.0 Men
2026
MPRC-Atkins
2026 Mixed 55 & Over · 7.0 Mixed
2026
MPRC-Anderson/Broad
2025 Adult 55 & Over · 7.0 Men
2025
MPRC-Tompkins/Donahue
2025 Mixed 55 & Over · 7.0 Mixed
2025
MPRC-Davis
2025 Adult 18 & Over · 3.5 Men
2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Gerald has been a steady 3.5 across all 5 seasons on record.

3.03.520222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2026 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 7.0, Gerald has gone from the 80th to the 41st percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2025.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
3.5
66.7%
6W–3L · 54.5% of games
7.0
65.6%
21W–11L · 54.9% of games
7.0mixed
47.8%
22W–24L · 50.4% of games
8.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history93 matches
W
2026-05-07 · MPRC-Atkins · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Steven Garlock
+0.010better than expected — took 67% of games against 59% expected
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-04-23 · MPRC-Atkins · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jim DeWeese
0.024below expectation — took 29% of games against 43% expected
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-04-19 · MPRC-Atkins · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kendra Rothert
+0.000better than expected — took 62% of games against 44% expected
6-3, 7-5
W
2026-01-11 · MPRC-Agnihotri/Atkins · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kevin Stonelake
0.003about as expected — took 53% of games against 55% expected
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2025-06-01 · MPRC-Davis · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ryan Tilley
+0.025about as expected — took 35% of games against 31% expected
4-6, 6-0, 1-0
W
2025-05-23 · MPRC-Tompkins/Donahue · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Josette Zervic
+0.000better than expected — took 60% of games against 38% expected
6-4, 6-4
L
2025-05-15 · MPRC-Atkins · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Dan Wolff
0.009below expectation — took 33% of games against 41% expected
6-4, 6-2
W
Robin Olson / Daniel Rousseau
2025-05-01 · MPRC-Atkins · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Dan Wolff
0.020below expectation — took 52% of games against 61% expected
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
L
2025-04-27 · MPRC-Davis · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with John Bohls
0.014below expectation — took 25% of games against 37% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
2025-04-18 · MPRC-Tompkins/Donahue · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Joann Donahue
+0.000about as expected — took 38% of games against 37% expected
7-6, 6-2
L
2025-04-08 · MPRC-Atkins · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with James Stenger
0.026below expectation — took 37% of games against 50% expected
6-4, 6-3
W
2025-04-04 · MPRC-Atkins · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Steven Garlock
0.000about as expected — took 56% of games against 56% expected
7-6, 7-5
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.