Teams

THPRD-Hockman/Takahashi

2026 Mixed 55 & Over · 7.0 Mixed

11 players · average NTRP 3.41 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.39 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.79
Lisa Hockman
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.57
Tomoko Hori
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.54
Evan Cohn
usually #2 Doubles 58%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.47
Xiaolu Huang
usually #3 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.41
James Takahashi
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.38
Paul Kreiter
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.38
Alex McIntosh
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.33
Sandi Martes
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.30
Nicole Norby
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
3.18
Kirk Planck
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.89
Barbara Gram
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Lisa Hockman
119W–35L career · type A
0%6%94%
3.79
3.5
Tomoko Hori
32W–17L career
0%62%38%
3.57
3.5
Evan Cohn
144W–73L career
0%73%27%
3.54
3.5
Xiaolu Huang
112W–43L career
0%88%12%
3.47
3.5
James Takahashi
101W–39L career
0%94%6%
3.41
3.5
Paul Kreiter
59W–25L career
0%96%4%
3.38
3.5
Alex McIntosh
86W–75L career
0%96%4%
3.38
3.5
Sandi Martes
137W–98L career
0%99%1%
3.33
3
Nicole Norby
85W–50L career
0%5%95%
3.30
3.5
Kirk Planck
91W–71L career
4%96%0%
3.18
3
Barbara Gram
127W–129L career
0%97%3%
2.89

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.