Search

Shweta Agrawal

PORTLAND, OR
3.0C year-end 2025
127 matches · 91W–36L · seasons 20232026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.39
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 28 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
0%
stay 3.0
100%
up to 3.5

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
PORTLAND · 3.0
1 of 15
OR · 3.0
2 of 600

Shweta is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Teams26 teams · 2023–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Shweta has been a steady 3.0 across all 4 seasons on record.

2.53.02023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Shweta has gone from the 49th to the 65th percentile of players at that level, 2025 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
3.0
75%
39W–13L · 66.5% of games
3.5
56.5%
13W–10L · 53% of games
6.0mixed
92.3%
12W–1L · 70.4% of games
7.0mixed
70.6%
12W–5L · 60.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history127 matches
W
Gilbert Chiang / Alexandra MacDonaldmixed
2026-07-11 · WHRC-Palmer/Bennett · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kim Bennett
+0.000about as expected — took 58% of games against 55% expected
7-5, 7-5
L
2026-07-10 · THPRD-Shull · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Srinivasa Kanamatha
+0.000below expectation — took 38% of games against 45% expected
6-3, 7-5
W
2026-06-20 · #1 Doubles · with Dawan Pandya
+0.029better than expected — took 67% of games against 51% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-06-20 · #2 Doubles · with Heike Droste
+0.011better than expected — took 58% of games against 53% expected
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-06-19 · #3 Doubles · with Ramya Gotety
+0.001about as expected — took 48% of games against 47% expected
7-6, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-06-14 · THPRD-Shull · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Srinivasa Kanamatha
+0.000better than expected — took 45% of games against 39% expected
6-7, 6-3
W
Kevin Mckearney / Jeanne Sinnottmixed
2026-06-13 · WHRC-Palmer/Bennett · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Reno Brown
+0.000about as expected — took 71% of games against 68% expected
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-06-06 · NOR-THPRD-Agrawal · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joan OByrne
0.028below expectation — took 40% of games against 53% expected
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-05-30 · NOR-THPRD-Agrawal · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mai-Anh Nguyen
0.009about as expected — took 59% of games against 61% expected
6-3, 7-6
W
Devrie Brennan / Naun Yvonne Kim
2026-05-09 · NOR-THPRD-Agrawal · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Heike Droste
+0.039better than expected — took 80% of games against 58% expected
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-05-02 · NOR-WHRC-Nordstrom · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Emily Nordstrom
+0.013better than expected — took 92% of games against 73% expected
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-05-01 · NOR-THPRD-Agrawal · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Heike Droste
+0.055better than expected — took 86% of games against 55% expected
6-0, 6-2
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.