← Search

Shaelah Harmon

Kennewick, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
52 matches · 38W–14L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Shaelah Harmon to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history52 matches
W
2026-08-08 · #1 Doubles · with Danielle Dunigan championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-08-07 · #1 Doubles · with Rikki West championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-08-07 · #1 Doubles · with Rikki West championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-08-02 · EW-PC-West · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Rikki West
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-08-02 · EW-PC-West · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Rikki West
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-08-01 · EW-PC-West · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Rikki West
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-08-01 · EW-PC-West · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Rikki West
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-07-31 · EW-PC-West · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Rikki West
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
L
2026-07-11 · #3 Doubles · with Emerson Clark championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
L
2026-07-10 · #1 Doubles · with Emerson Clark championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
W
2026-04-18 · #1 Doubles · with Rikki West championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-04-17 · #1 Doubles · with Rikki West championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams9 teams · 2023–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
2.5
100%
4W–0L · 75.4% of games
3.0
81.2%
13W–3L · 61.7% of games
6.0mixed
60%
3W–2L · 65.6% of games
7.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 58% of the time
#1 Doubles
58%
30 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
12 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
9 matches
#1 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova