SHC-Lomax

2026 Mixed 18 & Over · 7.0 Mixed

11 players · average NTRP 3.45 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

Scouting

Roster averages 3.38 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.67

Pete Stirling

usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4

3.66

Jack Lomax

usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5

3.54

Gregory Hobi

usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5

3.44

Andrea Hobi

usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5

3.37

Daniel Apsey

usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Male Doubles 40% · published 3.5

3.35

Ruth Semon

usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5

3.27

Alex Jones

usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3

—

Dan Bingham

usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5

3.25

Roger Dehoog

usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5

3.15

Monica Christensen

usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5

3.12

Megan Mandel

usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3

Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

Pete Stirling

23W–16L career

6%94%0%

3.67

3.5

Jack Lomax

21W–9L career

0%36%64%

3.66

3.5

Gregory Hobi

38W–30L career

0%72%28%

3.54

3.5

Andrea Hobi

63W–46L career

0%91%9%

3.44

3.5

Daniel Apsey

13W–10L career

0%95%5%

3.37

3.5

Ruth Semon

51W–31L career

0%98%2%

3.35

Alex Jones

22W–27L career

0%10%90%

3.27

3.5

Dan Bingham

46W–43L career

not enough data

—

3.5

Roger Dehoog

5W–43L career · type M

4%94%2%

3.25

3.5

Monica Christensen

27W–36L career

7%93%0%

3.15

Megan Mandel

37W–27L career

0%48%53%

3.12

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.