SHC-Christensen

2026 Mixed 55 & Over · 7.0 Mixed

12 players · average NTRP 3.46 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

Scouting

Roster averages 3.18 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.68

Matthew Trank

usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 4

3.25

Roger Dehoog

usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5

3.20

Jeff Perry

usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5

3.20

Yan Morrissey

usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5

3.19

Carmen Warda

usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5

3.18

Doug Denney

usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5

3.15

Jeff Welter

usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5

3.12

Julie Trujillo

usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5

3.12

SHAWNA THOMPSON

usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3

3.09

Mary Rudinsky

usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5

3.00

Dan Wendling

usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5

2.96

Jennifer Trank

usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3

Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

Matthew Trank

78W–63L career

3%97%0%

3.68

3.5

Roger Dehoog

5W–43L career · type M

4%94%2%

3.25

3.5

Jeff Perry

35W–16L career

2%98%0%

3.20

3.5

Yan Morrissey

54W–73L career

2%98%0%

3.20

3.5

Carmen Warda

68W–35L career

3%97%0%

3.19

3.5

Doug Denney

62W–36L career

4%96%0%

3.18

3.5

Jeff Welter

77W–46L career

9%91%0%

3.15

3.5

Julie Trujillo

15W–18L career

9%91%0%

3.12

SHAWNA THOMPSON

74W–34L career

0%47%53%

3.12

3.5

Mary Rudinsky

50W–42L career

16%84%0%

3.09

3.5

Dan Wendling

52W–43L career

35%65%0%

3.00

Jennifer Trank

93W–104L career

0%89%11%

2.96

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.