← Search

Jesse Inkpen

portland, OR
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
107 matches · 46W–61L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jesse Inkpen to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history107 matches
W
2026-08-09 · MAC-Wehner · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Monica Ao mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 7-6
L
2026-07-18 · MAC-Wehner · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Carrie Mccaskill mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-7
L
2026-06-13 · MAC-Inkpen · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Zachary Wright
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-30 · MAC-Inkpen · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Zachary Wright
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-05-16 · MAC-Inkpen · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Matt Curtis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-03-14 · MAC-Meyer · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joe Malboeuf
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-02-28 · MAC-Meyer · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
L
2026-02-07 · MAC-Meyer · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christopher Graham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-01-17 · MAC-Meyer · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tuan Truong
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-01-11 · MAC-Meyer · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Matt Curtis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
Jen Lewis / Octavian Tudorache
2025-08-09 · MAC-Caldicott/Eckelman · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nicolle Lochner mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 0-6
L
2025-07-27 · MAC-Caldicott/Eckelman · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kathleen Cooney mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams45 teams · 2013–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
46.1%
35W–41L · 48.4% of games
4.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 53.9% of games
7.0mixed
21.4%
3W–11L · 39.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 30% of the time
#1 Doubles
30%
32 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
24 matches
#1 Singles
20%
21 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
16 matches
#2 Singles
13%
14 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert