← Search

Nicolle Lochner

Portland, OR
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
109 matches · 36W–73L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Nicolle Lochner to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history109 matches
L
2025-11-23 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sherry Kempin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2025-11-16 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sue Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2025-11-09 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sue Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
L
2025-10-19 · MAC-Hill/Weinstein · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jaymi Sladen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-7
L
2025-10-10 · MAC-Hill/Weinstein · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kristin Campbell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2025-09-13 · MAC-Hill/Weinstein · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mia Birk
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
Jen Lewis / Octavian Tudorache
2025-08-09 · MAC-Caldicott/Eckelman · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jesse Inkpen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 0-6
W
2025-07-30 · Lochner-The Waves · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christy Buckman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2025-07-28 · Lochner-The Waves · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christy Buckman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
L
2025-07-27 · MAC-Caldicott/Eckelman · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mark Christensen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
L
2025-07-26 · MAC-Caldicott/Eckelman · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mark Christensen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 0-6
L
2025-07-01 · Lochner-The Waves · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Caroline Popma
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams68 teams · 2011–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
38.2%
21W–34L · 46.7% of games
7.0
31.6%
6W–13L · 42.9% of games
7.0mixed
27.3%
9W–24L · 42.2% of games
8.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 36% of the time
#2 Doubles
36%
39 matches
#1 Doubles
34%
37 matches
#3 Doubles
30%
33 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova