Search

Deb Garris

Portland, OR
3.5C year-end 2025
152 matches · 83W–69L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.53
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 19 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
38%
stay 3.5
62%
up to 4.0
Projected to December: 0% down · 79% stay · 21% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.44. Lower than today’s 3.53 because form regresses — players this far above their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Portland · 3.5
19 of 399
OR · 3.5
50 of 735

Deb is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Deb has been 3.5 for all 8 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the middle of the band to the top.

3.03.520192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 7.0, Deb has gone from the 48th to the 67th percentile of players at that level, 2025 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level8 levels played
3.5
65.4%
34W–18L · 57.9% of games
4.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0
65.6%
21W–11L · 57.3% of games
8.0
0%
0W–4L · 32.4% of games
7.0mixed
42.9%
6W–8L · 47.9% of games
8.0mixed
28.6%
6W–15L · 42.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history152 matches
W
Jennifer Charron / Heidi Kelly
2026-05-10 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Maria Himelman
+0.084better than expected — took 86% of games against 43% expected
6-2, 6-0
W
Heather Black / Jennifer Charron
2026-05-03 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Maria Himelman
+0.004about as expected — took 50% of games against 49% expected
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W
Heidi Kelly / Jennifer Charron
2026-04-10 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Nadine Kim
+0.059better than expected — took 67% of games against 40% expected
6-4, 6-2
W
Denise Roethenmund / Connie Weinstein
2026-03-30 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kem Theilig
+0.028better than expected — took 63% of games against 49% expected
6-3, 6-4
W
Alice Santos / Caroline Cavelti
2026-03-28 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Maria Himelman
+0.018better than expected — took 67% of games against 56% expected
6-4, 6-2
L
Suzette Willetts / Catherine Wilson
2026-02-28 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary Fox
0.001about as expected — took 55% of games against 53% expected
1-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
Laura Agelopoulos / Jennifer Bouffard
2026-02-23 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Susan Caruso
0.025below expectation — took 41% of games against 53% expected
7-5, 6-4
W
Janice Creager / Cindy Yavari
2026-02-09 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Susan Caruso
+0.074better than expected — took 100% of games against 58% expected
6-0, 6-0
W
Gayle Friedman / Jennifer Bouffard
2026-02-07 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary Fox
0.005about as expected — took 60% of games against 60% expected
6-4, 6-4
L
Rebecca Berman / Ellen Plummerchamps
2026-01-31 · #1 Doubles · with Doris Hoffmann
0.038below expectation — took 33% of games against 52% expected
6-4, 6-2
L
Lori Lovering / Amanda Albertchamps
2026-01-30 · #3 Doubles · with Maria Himelman
0.025below expectation — took 33% of games against 47% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
Doreen Buchy / Charisse Mayer
2026-01-26 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Maria Himelman
0.007about as expected — took 50% of games against 54% expected
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.