Teams

MAC-Leedy/Davis

2026 Adult 55 & Over · 7.0 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.5 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.20 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.46
Dory Simons
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.44
Tove Maloco
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.42
Janae Pyle
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.25
Alexandra Lee
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Wendy Whitsell
published 3.5
3.24
Jill Eilers
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.20
Hanny Tan
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.20
Rico McIver
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.10
Alison Davis
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.06
Catherine Leedy
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.05
Laura Laney
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.00
Gretchen Wagner
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.93
Nancy Williams
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Dory Simons
65W–31L career
0%88%12%
3.46
3.5
Tove Maloco
86W–43L career
0%92%8%
3.44
3.5
Janae Pyle
98W–49L career
0%93%7%
3.42
3.5
Alexandra Lee
32W–13L career
2%98%1%
3.25
3.5
Wendy Whitsell
33W–25L career
not enough data
3.5
Jill Eilers
34W–18L career
2%98%0%
3.24
3.5
Hanny Tan
44W–24L career
6%94%0%
3.20
3.5
Rico McIver
44W–33L career
8%90%1%
3.20
3.5
Alison Davis
80W–62L career
24%75%1%
3.10
3.5
Catherine Leedy
86W–119L career
19%81%0%
3.06
3.5
Laura Laney
59W–48L career
20%80%0%
3.05
3.5
Gretchen Wagner
40W–54L career
33%67%0%
3.00
3.5
Nancy Williams
59W–52L career
54%46%0%
2.93

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.