Search

Debra Hall

Portland, OR
3.5C year-end 2025
96 matches · 58W–38L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.25
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 14 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
100%
stay 3.5
0%
up to 4.0

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the middle of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Portland · 3.5
195 of 399
OR · 3.5
387 of 735

Debra is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Teams28 teams · 2015–2026
Desert Diamonds
Adult 55 & Over · 7.0 Women
2026
Court Chaos
Adult 65 & Over · 7.0 Women
2026
MPRC-Hazel/Morrissey 7.0
2026 Adult 55 & Over · 7.0 Women
2026
Desert Diamonds
Adult 55 & Over · 7.0 Women
2025
Ladies Of The Court
Adult 65 & Over · 7.0 Women
2025
MPRC-Tompkins/Mitchell
2025 Adult 55 & Over · 7.0 Women
2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Debra has been 3.5 for all 2 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the top.

3.03.520192024

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 7.0, Debra has gone from the 56th to the 39th percentile of players at that level, 2020 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
3.5
44.4%
4W–5L · 45.4% of games
6.0
70%
7W–3L · 62.4% of games
7.0
59.7%
43W–29L · 53.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history96 matches
L
Linda Helixon / Pat Gospodarek
2026-02-23 · Court Chaos · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jacque Goodrich
0.004about as expected — took 48% of games against 49% expected
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
Keri Davis / Nancy Paregien
2026-02-09 · Court Chaos · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jacque Goodrich
0.021below expectation — took 42% of games against 52% expected
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
Polly Whitehorn / Monique Bredas
2026-01-26 · Court Chaos · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jacque Goodrich
+0.045better than expected — took 75% of games against 51% expected
6-3, 6-1
L
Hedy Kurland / Margo Sackheim
2026-01-19 · Desert Diamonds · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jacqueline Czeiska
0.003about as expected — took 48% of games against 48% expected
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
Amy Huether / Diane Ewing
2026-01-12 · Desert Diamonds · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jacque Goodrich
0.001about as expected — took 50% of games against 51% expected
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W
Frances Friedlander / Jill Frost
2026-01-05 · Desert Diamonds · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jacque Goodrich
+0.020better than expected — took 59% of games against 50% expected
7-6, 6-3
W
Justine Miller / Mary Quilling
2025-12-22 · Desert Diamonds · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Margaret Hyer
+0.012better than expected — took 59% of games against 53% expected
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
Bobbie Hartter / Melba Swift
2025-12-15 · Desert Diamonds · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Margaret Hyer
+0.056better than expected — took 80% of games against 50% expected
6-2, 6-1
W
Betty Staniec / Gillian Cook
2025-11-24 · Desert Diamonds · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Margaret Hyer
+0.038better than expected — took 67% of games against 48% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
Sandra Moffett / Ginger Buetow
2025-11-17 · Desert Diamonds · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Margaret Hyer
+0.030better than expected — took 59% of games against 45% expected
6-4, 7-5
L
2025-10-18 · MPRC-Hazel/Morrissey 7.0 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Margaret Rowland
0.026below expectation — took 29% of games against 44% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
2025-10-10 · MPRC-Hazel/Morrissey 7.0 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Susan Bradley
0.017below expectation — took 25% of games against 38% expected
6-1, 6-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.