← Search

Keri Davis

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Tucson, AZ
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
59 matches · 30W–29L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history59 matches
L
2026-03-23 · SAZ 65/ 7.0 W- Frances Freidlander · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mary Zimmerman
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-7
L
2026-02-23 · SAZ 65/ 7.0 W- Frances Freidlander · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nancy Paregien
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-02-09 · SAZ 65/ 7.0 W- Frances Freidlander · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nancy Paregien
loading the estimate
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-02-09 · SAZ 65/ 7.0 W- Frances Freidlander · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nancy Paregien
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-02-02 · SAZ 65/ 7.0 W- Frances Freidlander · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nancy Paregien
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-01-26 · SAZ 65/ 7.0 W- Frances Freidlander · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jill Frost
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-01-19 · Prickly Pairs · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mary Collins
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-01-14 · Prickly Pairs · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mary Collins
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-0, 1-0
L
2026-01-12 · Prickly Pairs · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Deborah Marshall
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
L
2025-12-12 · Prickly Pairs · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mary Zimmerman
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
L
2025-04-21 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nancy Paregien
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 0-6
W
2025-04-14 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kathryn Manthey
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams6 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
50%
7W–7L · 55% of games
7.0
50%
21W–21L · 49.2% of games
7.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 44% of the time
#1 Doubles
44%
26 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
17 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
10 matches
#2 Singles
7%
4 matches
#1 Singles
3%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert