← Search

Marilyn Semones

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Tucson, AZ
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
70 matches · 35W–35L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history70 matches
L
2026-03-26 · Volley Girls · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sue Danner
loading the estimate
6-1, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-03-19 · Volley Girls · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sue Danner
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-02-23 · Sweet Shots · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Shelley Kruk
loading the estimate
6-4, 7-6
W
2026-02-16 · Sweet Shots · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Janet Bitter
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-01-19 · Chicks with Sticks · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kim Sweetman
loading the estimate
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
2025-12-22 · Chicks with Sticks · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Denise A Cahalan
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
W
2025-12-08 · Chicks with Sticks · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Denise A Cahalan
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-4
W
2025-11-10 · Chicks with Sticks · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Denise A Cahalan
loading the estimate
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
2025-04-14 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Yanny Mahoney
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 3-6
W
2025-01-27 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Yanny Mahoney
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 7-6
W
2024-04-17 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Joanie Rooker
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
2024-04-15 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Joanie Rooker
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 5-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams20 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
65.6%
21W–11L · 55.6% of games
7.0
37.1%
13W–22L · 40.9% of games
7.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
27 matches
#2 Doubles
36%
25 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
18 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert