← Search

Mary Fernandes

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Oracle, AZ
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
20 matches · 4W–16L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history20 matches
L
2026-03-23 · Cosmo Girls · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Linda Keller
loading the estimate
0-6, 3-6
L
2026-02-23 · Cosmo Girls · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Linda Keller
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-02-09 · Cosmo Girls · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Linda Keller
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-02-02 · Cosmo Girls · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Linda Keller
loading the estimate
3-6, 0-6
L
2026-01-19 · Cosmo Girls · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Linda Keller
loading the estimate
6-1, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-01-12 · Cosmo Girls · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Linda Keller
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
W
2025-11-17 · Cosmo Girls · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Paula Cartwright
loading the estimate
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2025-04-07 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Linda Keller
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-4
L
Lesli Hanby / Brenda Sussna
2025-03-24 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Linda Keller
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 3-6
L
2025-03-03 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Linda Keller
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 0-6
L
2024-04-17 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Susan Pharr
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-6, 2-6, 0-1
L
2024-04-15 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Susan Pharr
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams4 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0
11.1%
2W–16L · 34% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 50% of the time
#3 Doubles
50%
10 matches
#2 Doubles
35%
7 matches
#1 Doubles
15%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams