← Search

Venita Ransom

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Tucson, AZ
4.0S year-end 2025
i
Self-rated, or a medical appeal
40 matches · 26W–14L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history40 matches
W
2026-03-23 · SAZ 65/ 7.0 W- Frances Freidlander · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jill Frost
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-3
W
2026-03-02 · SAZ 65/ 7.0 W- Frances Freidlander · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Frances Friedlander
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-02-23 · SAZ 65/ 7.0 W- Frances Freidlander · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jill Frost
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-02-09 · SAZ 65/ 7.0 W- Frances Freidlander · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jill Frost
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-02-09 · SAZ 65/ 7.0 W- Frances Freidlander · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Frances Friedlander
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-01-26 · SAZ 65/ 7.0 W- Frances Freidlander · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Frances Friedlander
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2024-03-04 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Anne Williams
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 0-5
W
2024-02-12 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jill Frost
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2023-03-13 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Brenda Harried
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 2-6
W
N/A
2021-03-24 · CV-Rancho Las Palmas/Ransom · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Nancy Closson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2021-03-17 · CV-Rancho Las Palmas/Ransom · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Diane Pickett
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-4
W
2021-03-11 · CV-Rancho Las Palmas/Ransom · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Diane Pickett
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 7-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams8 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
7.0
87.5%
7W–1L · 59.7% of games
8.0
40%
8W–12L · 46.9% of games
4.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
90%
9W–1L · 62.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 45% of the time
#3 Doubles
45%
18 matches
#1 Doubles
33%
13 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
9 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams