← Search

Denise Phillips

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Tucson, AZ
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
101 matches · 71W–30L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history101 matches
L
2026-03-09 · Desert Gems · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kathern Kortus
loading the estimate
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-02-23 · Desert Gems · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mary Collins
loading the estimate
6-3, 7-5
W
2026-02-02 · Desert Gems · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Laura Ingold
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-01-26 · Desert Gems · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Janet Jensen
loading the estimate
6-2, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-01-19 · Prickly Pairs · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with JoAnn Bosworth
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-01-05 · Prickly Pairs · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with JoAnn Bosworth
loading the estimate
1-6, 4-6
W
2025-12-22 · Prickly Pairs · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kathern Kortus
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-0
L
2025-12-12 · Prickly Pairs · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Caryl Wallin
loading the estimate
1-6, 3-6
L
2025-12-01 · Prickly Pairs · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jean Lorch
loading the estimate
2-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2025-11-24 · Prickly Pairs · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with JoAnn Bosworth
loading the estimate
7-6, 2-6, 0-1
W
2025-11-10 · Prickly Pairs · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jean Lorch
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-2
W
2025-04-21 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Dagmar Hampton
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams14 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
61.3%
19W–12L · 52.4% of games
6.5
60%
3W–2L · 65.9% of games
7.0
68%
34W–16L · 57.5% of games
7.0mixed
100%
15W–0L · 69.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
38 matches
#3 Doubles
35%
35 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
24 matches
#1 Singles
4%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer