← Search

Brenda Harried

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Madison, WI
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
45 matches · 26W–19L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history45 matches
L
2026-01-19 · Acing Gracefully · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Penny Hogan
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-01-12 · Acing Gracefully · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Myrene Conner
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-01-05 · Acing Gracefully · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Linda Foy
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-2
W
2025-04-14 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nancy Paregien
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-0, 6-1
W
2025-04-07 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Keri Davis
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-2
W
2025-03-31 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kathryn Manthey
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 7-5
L
2025-03-24 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Keri Davis
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 0-6
W
2025-03-03 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Keri Davis
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2025-02-17 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Linda Foy
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 3-6
W
2025-02-10 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kathy Jensen
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-4
L
2025-02-03 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nancy Paregien
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L
2024-04-29 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Linda Foy
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-6, 0-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams5 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.0
60%
3W–2L · 50% of games
7.0
62.1%
18W–11L · 53.3% of games
8.0
45.5%
5W–6L · 46.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 51% of the time
#1 Doubles
51%
23 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
11 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
11 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Pressure is a privilege.
Billie Jean King