← Search

Michelle Ruffing

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Brooklyn Park, MN
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
187 matches · 77W–110L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history187 matches
W
2026-06-25 · Miller 65&Over MN Slice · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Patricia Fettes
loading the estimate
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-06-11 · Miller 65&Over MN Slice · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Ann Hackett
loading the estimate
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-21 · Miller 65&Over MN Slice · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Ann Hackett
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-05-14 · Miller 65&Over MN Slice · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Patricia Fettes
loading the estimate
6-3, 0-6, 1-0
L
Diane Holland / Marsha Friedli
2026-01-31 · Northern/Miller/65&Over6.0W · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Patricia Fettes championship
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 3-6
L
Pam Manuel / Janis Willmann
2026-01-30 · Northern/Miller/65&Over6.0W · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Anita Goulett championship
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 6-7, 0-1
L
2026-01-19 · Queen Bees · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Anita Johnstun
loading the estimate
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-01-05 · Queen Bees · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lorna Farrell
loading the estimate
2-6, 0-6
L
2025-11-10 · Queen Bees · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Anita Johnstun
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
L
2025-07-17 · Northern/Miller/65&Over6.0W · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Anita Goulett
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 6-1, 0-1
W
N/A
2025-07-07 · Fettes: Minnesota Slice Girls · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Ann Hackett
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2025-06-30 · Fettes: Minnesota Slice Girls · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kathleen Miller
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 5-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams36 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
39.6%
44W–67L · 46.2% of games
6.0
49.2%
29W–30L · 50.4% of games
7.0
23.1%
3W–10L · 38.7% of games
7.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 42.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 46% of the time
#1 Doubles
46%
86 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
57 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
42 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is mostly mental. You win or lose the match before you even go out there.
Venus Williams