← Search

Anita Goulett

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Dayton, MN
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
24 matches · 9W–15L · seasons 2019–2025
Match history24 matches
L
Pam Manuel / Janis Willmann
2026-01-30 · Northern/Miller/65&Over6.0W · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Michelle Ruffing championship
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 6-7, 0-1
L
2025-07-17 · Northern/Miller/65&Over6.0W · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Michelle Ruffing
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 6-1, 0-1
L
2025-06-19 · Northern/Miller/65&Over6.0W · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Connie Carlson
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 1-6
L
2025-05-29 · Northern/Miller/65&Over6.0W · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Patricia Fettes
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W
2025-05-15 · Northern/Miller/65&Over6.0W · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Elizabeth Anderson
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
2024-07-18 · Miller/Fettes MN Slice 65+ · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kathleen Miller
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 2-6
L
2024-06-27 · Miller/Fettes MN Slice 65+ · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Elizabeth Anderson
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 1-6
W
2024-06-13 · Miller/Fettes MN Slice 65+ · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kathleen Miller
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2024-06-06 · Miller/Fettes MN Slice 65+ · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kathleen Miller
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 7-5
L
2024-05-30 · Miller/Fettes MN Slice 65+ · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Michelle Ruffing
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 2-6
W
2024-05-23 · Miller/Fettes MN Slice 65+ · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kathleen Miller
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-2
L
2021-07-28 · Braun · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Connie Carlson
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams4 teams · 2019–2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level1 level played
6.0
37.5%
9W–15L · 46.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 42% of the time
#2 Doubles
42%
10 matches
#1 Doubles
29%
7 matches
#3 Doubles
29%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer