← Search

Mary Zimmerman

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Tucson, AZ
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
68 matches · 20W–48L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history68 matches
L
2026-03-23 · SAZ 65/ 7.0 W- Frances Freidlander · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Keri Davis
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-7
W
2026-02-02 · SAZ 65/ 7.0 W- Frances Freidlander · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Frances Friedlander
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2025-12-22 · Prickly Pairs · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Julie McMurray
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-2
L
2025-12-15 · Prickly Pairs · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Julie McMurray
loading the estimate
3-6, 5-7
L
2025-12-12 · Prickly Pairs · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Keri Davis
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
L
2025-11-24 · Prickly Pairs · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Julie McMurray
loading the estimate
3-6, 0-6
L
2025-04-07 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Benith MacPherson
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2025-03-17 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Linda Foy
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 3-6
L
2025-02-24 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jill Frost
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 2-6
L
2025-02-03 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Benith MacPherson
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 5-7
L
2025-01-27 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jill Frost
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 1-6
W
2024-04-29 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jill Frost
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams7 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.5
42.9%
6W–8L · 47.1% of games
7.0
25.9%
14W–40L · 42.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 35% of the time
#2 Doubles
35%
24 matches
#3 Doubles
35%
24 matches
#1 Doubles
19%
13 matches
#1 Singles
7%
5 matches
#2 Singles
3%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal