← Search

Melissa Dollar

Portland, OR
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
72 matches · 31W–41L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Melissa Dollar to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history72 matches
L
2026-05-31 · CRRC-Jacobsen/Gill · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-05-17 · CRRC-Jacobsen/Gill · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Madison Scully
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-09 · CRRC-Jacobsen/Gill · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarah Partch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
W
N/A
2026-05-03 · CRRC-Jacobsen/Gill · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-04-04 · CRRC-Jacobsen/Gill · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Skye Larsen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 1-6
L
2026-03-29 · CRRC-Jacobsen/Gill · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-02-22 · CRRC-Higgins/Belott · #1 Female Doubles · 8.0 · with Veronica White mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6
L
2026-02-22 · CRRC-Higgins/Belott · #1 Mixed Doubles · 8.0 · with Spencer Byrd mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6
L
2026-02-07 · GLVR-Gill · #1 Female Doubles · 7.0 · with Monica Kendall mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-6
W
2026-02-01 · GLVR-Gill · #1 Female Doubles · 7.0 · with Madison Scully mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-5
L
2026-01-31 · CRRC-Higgins/Belott · #1 Female Singles · 8.0 mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6
L
2026-01-30 · GLVR-Gill · #1 Female Singles · 7.0 mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams18 teams · 2023–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
0.0
40%
2W–3L · 40.2% of games
3.0
57.1%
8W–6L · 56.1% of games
3.5
20%
4W–16L · 41.4% of games
6.0mixed
100%
6W–0L · 67.9% of games
7.0mixed
52.6%
10W–9L · 51.4% of games
8.0mixed
0%
0W–5L · 26.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 29% of the time
#1 Doubles
29%
21 matches
#1 Singles
19%
14 matches
#2 Doubles
13%
9 matches
#2 Singles
11%
8 matches
#1 Female Doubles
10%
7 matches
#1 Female Singles
8%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams