← Search

Desiree Bliss

Portland, OR
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
103 matches · 67W–36L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Desiree Bliss to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history103 matches
W
2026-08-08 · #3 Doubles · with Dory Simons championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
Faith Beers / Karen Pan
2026-08-08 · #1 Doubles · with Dory Simons championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-08-04 · Sets and the City · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christy MacColl
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-14 · Sets and the City · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Margo Yohner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-07-07 · You've Met Your Match · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with ANN MILLER
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-24 · You've Met Your Match · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with ANN MILLER
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-06-22 · You've Met Your Match · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with ANN MILLER
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-21 · #1 Doubles · with Dory Simons championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-06-20 · #2 Doubles · with Dory Simons championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-06-19 · #2 Doubles · with Alexandra Lee championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-15 · Sets and the City · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Margo Yohner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-06-14 · NOR-MAC-Lamprecht · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Janae Pyle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams32 teams · 2018–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
60%
6W–4L · 56% of games
3.0
75%
15W–5L · 66.9% of games
3.5
72.7%
24W–9L · 57.3% of games
4.0
40%
6W–9L · 48.7% of games
6.0mixed
100%
4W–0L · 67.1% of games
7.0mixed
60%
3W–2L · 52.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 54% of the time
#1 Doubles
54%
56 matches
#2 Doubles
19%
20 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
19 matches
#2 Singles
6%
6 matches
#1 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert