← Search

Madeleine Bourland

Portland, OR
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
118 matches · 65W–53L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Madeleine Bourland to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history118 matches
W
2026-08-08 · MAC-Bourland · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jason Trinchero mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-07-14 · MAC-Bourland · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jason Trinchero mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-0, 1-0
W
2026-06-21 · MAC-Bourland · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jason Trinchero mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-14 · THPRD-Stevenson/Jacobs · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Howlett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-31 · THPRD-Stevenson/Jacobs · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Stevenson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-05-03 · NOR-THPRD-Stevenson · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with David Graham mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-05-03 · THPRD-Stevenson/Jacobs · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dolores Corley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-18 · THPRD-Stevenson/Jacobs · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Howlett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-03-28 · NOR-THPRD-Stevenson · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Brian Parker mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-02-22 · THPRD-Stevenson/Jacobs · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Stevenson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-02-08 · MAC-Nearn · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Adrienne Dedelow
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-02-01 · THPRD-Stevenson/Jacobs · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Stevenson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams46 teams · 2014–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
2.5
71.4%
10W–4L · 58.7% of games
3.0
46.9%
23W–26L · 48.4% of games
3.5
0%
0W–7L · 31% of games
6.0mixed
64.1%
25W–14L · 57.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 36% of the time
#2 Doubles
36%
42 matches
#3 Doubles
34%
40 matches
#1 Doubles
31%
36 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams