Search

David Floyd

Portland, OR
3.0A year-end 2025
93 matches · 56W–37L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.08
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 19 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
16%
stay 3.0
84%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 62% stay · 38% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.98. Lower than today’s 3.08 because form regresses — players this far above their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Portland · 3.0
46 of 357
OR · 3.0
77 of 600

David is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Teams23 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

David has been 3.0 for all 7 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the middle of the band to the top.

2.53.02019202020222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, David has gone from the 7th to the 85th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
3.0
73%
27W–10L · 57.9% of games
3.5
37.5%
3W–5L · 47.2% of games
6.0mixed
65.7%
23W–12L · 56.1% of games
7.0mixed
0%
0W–4L · 24.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history93 matches
L
2026-06-20 · #2 Doubles · with Luke Burke
0.053below expectation — took 20% of games against 48% expected
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-06-13 · PT&E/SJRC-Bollaert/Bednarz · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Thomas Croll
0.010about as expected — took 46% of games against 50% expected
7-6, 7-6
W
Hunter Chace / Zachary Casanover
2026-05-24 · PT&E/SJRC-Bollaert/Bednarz · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Thomas Croll
+0.011better than expected — took 80% of games against 67% expected
6-2, 6-1
W
Graham Rykiel / Tamarsh Abeysekera
2026-05-10 · PT&E/SJRC-Bollaert/Bednarz · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Thomas Croll
+0.016better than expected — took 75% of games against 62% expected
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-05-10 · PT&E/SJRC-Simons · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mario Sanchez
+0.064better than expected — took 75% of games against 43% expected
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-05-09 · PT&E/SJRC-Ruhsenberger · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Shelley Hutley
+0.000about as expected — took 47% of games against 51% expected
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-03 · PT&E/SJRC-Ruhsenberger · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Shuping Li
+0.000below expectation — took 29% of games against 56% expected
6-2, 6-3
W
Luis Ortiz / Kenneth Rock
2026-05-02 · PT&E/SJRC-Bollaert/Bednarz · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Danny Peter
0.012about as expected — took 71% of games against 69% expected
6-2, 6-3
W
Ryan Fitzgerald / Khaden Jee
2026-04-26 · PT&E/SJRC-Bollaert/Bednarz · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Danny Peter
+0.027better than expected — took 80% of games against 62% expected
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-04-26 · PT&E/SJRC-Simons · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Thomas Croll
+0.056better than expected — took 55% of games against 35% expected
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-12 · #1 Doubles · with Joshua Toole
0.010below expectation — took 25% of games against 36% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-04-11 · #1 Doubles · with Joshua Toole
0.010below expectation — took 38% of games against 44% expected
7-6, 6-2
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.