← Search

Thomas Griffin

Portland, OR
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
78 matches · 42W–36L · seasons 2022–2027

Captains: add Thomas Griffin to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history78 matches
W
2026-09-11 · IRV-Lewis/Quisling · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Lucia Parker mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-14 · #1 Doubles · with Nicholas Kampars championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-7
L
2026-08-07 · #1 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-07 · #3 Doubles · with Tate Kuerbis championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-07-29 · Filthy Dutch Birds · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nicholas Kampars
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-07-24 · Filthy Dutch Birds · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Brendan Dineen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-21 · Filthy Dutch Birds · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Brendan Dineen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
L
2026-07-11 · #1 Doubles · with Allison Ferre championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
W
2026-07-10 · #3 Doubles · with Allison Ferre championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-06-22 · Filthy Dutch Birds · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Brendan Dineen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-06-21 · #1 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
W
2026-06-19 · #1 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams17 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
56.6%
30W–23L · 56.2% of games
3.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
80%
8W–2L · 57.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 46% of the time
#1 Doubles
46%
36 matches
#1 Singles
19%
15 matches
#2 Doubles
14%
11 matches
#3 Doubles
12%
9 matches
#2 Singles
9%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert