Teams

NOR-IRV-Lewis

2026 Adult 18 & Over · 3.0 Men

12 players · average NTRP 3 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 2.97 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.13
Bryan Potter
usually #1 Doubles 92%, also #2 Doubles 8% · published 3
3.11
Jason Bolt
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Singles 29% · published 3
3.08
Jared Rollier
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
3.06
Nicholas Kampars
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
3.05
Thomas Griffin
usually #1 Doubles 46%, also #1 Singles 27% · published 3
3.04
Joshua Lewis
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 3
2.98
Tate Kuerbis
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.96
Brendan Dineen
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.94
Luis Ponce de Leon
usually #2 Doubles 25%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3
2.81
Paul Ecker
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.75
William Seidl
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.74
Kevin Franck
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Singles 40% · published 3
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3
Bryan Potter
69W–39L career
0%43%57%
3.13
3
Jason Bolt
31W–21L career
0%49%51%
3.11
3
Jared Rollier
47W–31L career
0%60%40%
3.08
3
Nicholas Kampars
27W–12L career
0%66%34%
3.06
3
Thomas Griffin
41W–33L career
0%69%31%
3.05
3
Joshua Lewis
63W–40L career
0%73%27%
3.04
3
Tate Kuerbis
55W–40L career
0%85%15%
2.98
3
Brendan Dineen
24W–14L career
0%88%12%
2.96
3
Luis Ponce de Leon
78W–46L career
0%92%8%
2.94
3
Paul Ecker
36W–49L career
0%98%1%
2.81
3
William Seidl
58W–56L career
3%96%1%
2.75
3
Kevin Franck
18W–32L career
1%99%0%
2.74

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.