Teams

IRV- Lewis/Kuerbis

2026 Adult 40 & Over · 3.0 Men

11 players · average NTRP 3 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 2.98 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.13
Bryan Potter
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.11
Jason Bolt
usually #3 Doubles 25%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3
3.07
Paul Burkhart
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3
3.06
Nicholas Kampars
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
3.05
Thomas Griffin
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
3.04
Joshua Lewis
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.98
Tate Kuerbis
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.94
Luis Ponce de Leon
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.85
Bryan LaMontagne
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.76
Brian DuVal
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.75
William Seidl
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3
Bryan Potter
69W–39L career
0%43%57%
3.13
3
Jason Bolt
31W–21L career
0%49%51%
3.11
3
Paul Burkhart
28W–40L career
0%61%39%
3.07
3
Nicholas Kampars
27W–12L career
0%66%34%
3.06
3
Thomas Griffin
41W–33L career
0%69%31%
3.05
3
Joshua Lewis
63W–40L career
0%73%27%
3.04
3
Tate Kuerbis
55W–40L career
0%85%15%
2.98
3
Luis Ponce de Leon
78W–46L career
0%92%8%
2.94
3
Bryan LaMontagne
27W–31L career
0%94%5%
2.85
3
Brian DuVal
23W–20L career
3%96%2%
2.76
3
William Seidl
58W–56L career
3%96%1%
2.75

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.