Search

Brendan Dineen

Portland, OR
3.0C year-end 2025
38 matches · 24W–14L · seasons 20222026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.96
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 18 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
71%
stay 3.0
29%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 93% stay · 7% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.88. Lower than today’s 2.96 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Portland · 3.0
104 of 357
OR · 3.0
172 of 600

Brendan is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Teams10 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Brendan has been 3.0 for all 5 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the middle of the band to the top.

2.53.020222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2022, 2023, 2024 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
3.0
65%
13W–7L · 55.9% of games
3.5
66.7%
4W–2L · 55% of games
6.0mixed
66.7%
4W–2L · 56.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history38 matches
L
Tim Jakubowski / John Naughton
2026-07-24 · Filthy Dutch Birds · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Thomas Griffin
0.061below expectation — took 29% of games against 59% expected
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-07-21 · Filthy Dutch Birds · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Thomas Griffin
+0.014better than expected — took 68% of games against 59% expected
6-1, 7-5
L
John Naughton / Andrew Jacobs
2026-06-28 · Filthy Dutch Birds · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nicholas Kampars
0.045below expectation — took 43% of games against 61% expected
6-2, 5-7, 1-0
W
Jason Graham / Monte Phillips
2026-06-22 · Filthy Dutch Birds · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Thomas Griffin
+0.026better than expected — took 75% of games against 59% expected
6-1, 6-3
W
Yongtian Zhang / Ryan Smithchamps
2026-06-21 · NOR-IRV-Lewis · #3 Doubles · with Jason Bolt
0.008about as expected — took 72% of games against 68% expected
7-5, 6-0
W
2026-06-20 · NOR-IRV-Lewis · #3 Doubles · with Gabe Miller
+0.052better than expected — took 60% of games against 39% expected
6-4, 6-4
W
Keaton Partch / Ryan Moychamps
2026-06-19 · NOR-IRV-Lewis · #2 Doubles · with Lech Kaiel
+0.013better than expected — took 67% of games against 58% expected
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-06-18 · CLUB RATZ · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ben Hoerster
0.003below expectation — took 28% of games against 35% expected
7-5, 6-0
W
Shan Randall / Md Imran Momtaz
2026-06-06 · NOR-IRV-Lewis · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lech Kaiel
+0.071better than expected — took 100% of games against 59% expected
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-05-23 · NOR-IRV-Lewis · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kevin Franck
+0.009about as expected — took 57% of games against 52% expected
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W
Andrew Seher / Kshitij Akash Kadam
2026-05-09 · NOR-IRV-Lewis · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Gabe Miller
+0.047better than expected — took 67% of games against 44% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
Marshall Levine / James Thomas
2026-04-04 · NOR-IRV-Lewis · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kevin Franck
+0.057better than expected — took 67% of games against 41% expected
6-2, 6-4
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.