← Search

Jonathan Fischer

Elma, WA
3.0S year-end 2025
i
Self-rated, or a medical appeal
28 matches · 26W–2L · seasons 2026–2027

Captains: add Jonathan Fischer to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history28 matches
W
2026-09-12 · STAC-Fischer · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Heather Akiyama mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-1
W
Aaron Artman / Christopher Bailey
2026-08-16 · #1 Doubles · with Michael Harn championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-08-15 · #1 Doubles · with Michael Harn championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-09 · STAC Men · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Michael Harn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-07 · #1 Doubles · with Michael Harn championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-08-07 · #1 Doubles · with Michael Harn championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
W
N/A
2026-08-06 · STAC Men · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Michael Harn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-08-05 · STAC Men · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Michael Harn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
N/A
2026-08-02 · STAC Men · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Michael Harn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-07-28 · STAC Men · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Michael Harn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-07-21 · STAC Men · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Michael Harn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-07-11 · STAC Men · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Michael Harn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams4 teams · 2026–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.0
95.7%
22W–1L · 69.9% of games
6.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 89% of the time
#1 Doubles
89%
25 matches
#3 Doubles
7%
2 matches
#2 Doubles
4%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams