← Search

Scott Baird

Lakewood, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
199 matches · 71W–128L · seasons 2020–2027

Captains: add Scott Baird to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history199 matches
W
2026-09-13 · LRC-Baird-Goon Platoon · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Sam Barnes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-09-12 · LRC-Baird · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Tricia Parsons mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-06 · DeVore · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Alex Christensen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-7
W
2026-08-04 · DeVore · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Alex Christensen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
N/A
2026-08-01 · JTC-Villalobos-Double Set Point · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lisa Kim mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-07-26 · JTC-Villalobos-Double Set Point · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Vicki Moll mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-21 · DeVore · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sam Barnes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-12 · LRC-Barnes-Mixed Lobsters 6.0 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Marianne Mikkelson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-09 · DeVore · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sam Barnes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-05 · DeVore · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Michael Devore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-06-27 · #2 Doubles · with Ken Enslow championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-0, 1-0
L
2026-06-26 · #2 Doubles · with Ken Enslow championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams47 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
35%
21W–39L · 43.6% of games
3.5
0%
0W–8L · 29.6% of games
6.0
57.7%
15W–11L · 48.9% of games
7.0
37.5%
3W–5L · 43.4% of games
6.0mixed
36.9%
24W–41L · 46% of games
7.0mixed
31.2%
5W–11L · 48.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 46% of the time
#2 Doubles
46%
91 matches
#3 Doubles
32%
64 matches
#1 Doubles
22%
43 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe