← Search

Lisa Kim

Puyallup, WA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
303 matches · 182W–121L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Lisa Kim to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history303 matches
L
2026-08-02 · JTC-Villalobos-Double Set Point · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Steve Stetter mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
N/A
2026-08-01 · JTC-Villalobos-Double Set Point · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Scott Baird mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-06-21 · JTC-Villalobos-Double Set Point · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Scott Baird mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 7-5
W
2026-05-09 · SWW-JTC-Villalobos · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sam Barnes mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-04-18 · SWW-JTC-Villalobos · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Scott Baird mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-04-05 · SWW-JTC-Villalobos · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Scott Baird mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-7, 0-1
W
2026-04-04 · SWW-JTC-Villalobos · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sam Barnes mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-03-21 · #3 Doubles · with Hong Vo championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-03-07 · SWW-LRC-Harris · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Hong Vo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-03-01 · SWW-LRC-Harris · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Hong Vo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-02-07 · SWW-LRC-Harris · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michelle Harris
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
W
2026-01-25 · SWW-LRC-Harris · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dana Johnston
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams47 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
4.0
65.6%
82W–43L · 54.6% of games
4.5
20%
1W–4L · 38.5% of games
8.0
71%
44W–18L · 57.6% of games
9.0
61.5%
8W–5L · 54.8% of games
7.0mixed
53.3%
16W–14L · 54.5% of games
8.0mixed
34.5%
10W–19L · 44.1% of games
9.0mixed
66.7%
8W–4L · 61.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
120 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
86 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
77 matches
#1 Singles
6%
17 matches
#2 Singles
1%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is mostly mental. You win or lose the match before you even go out there.
Venus Williams