← Search

Janet Mills

Vancouver, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
141 matches · 66W–75L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Janet Mills to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history141 matches
L
2026-07-05 · VTC-Porter/Griffith · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michael Jansen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-07-03 · VTC-Porter/Griffith · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Murray Jansen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-28 · VTC-Porter/Griffith · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Pete Kovalenko mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-05-31 · VTC-Griffith · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ericka Nelson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-03 · VTC-Mills/Porter · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with John Hapke mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-03 · VTC-Griffith · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Annie Sumpter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-04-25 · VTC-Mills/Porter · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Murray Jansen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 7-5
W
2026-04-18 · VTC-Griffith · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ericka Nelson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
W
2026-04-17 · VTC-Griffith · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lynne Nieda
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-04-04 · VTC-Griffith · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ellen Hodges
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-03-29 · VTC-Mills/Porter · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Pete Kovalenko mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 5-7
W
2026-03-08 · VTC-Griffith · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Julie Gorecki
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams40 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.5
57.8%
26W–19L · 52.6% of games
4.0
15.4%
2W–11L · 37.7% of games
7.0
56.2%
9W–7L · 56.9% of games
8.0
16.7%
1W–5L · 39.4% of games
6.0mixed
100%
5W–0L · 63.3% of games
7.0mixed
40.9%
18W–26L · 46.8% of games
8.0mixed
57.1%
4W–3L · 52.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 34% of the time
#1 Doubles
34%
48 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
47 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
38 matches
#1 Singles
4%
5 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
2 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is a perfect combination of violent action taking place in an atmosphere of total tranquillity.
Billie Jean King