← Teams

VTC-Mills/Porter

2026 Mixed 55 & Over · 7.0 Mixed

11 players · average NTRP 3.5 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.32
John Hapke
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.31
Lynne Nieda
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.29
Pete Kovalenko
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.25
Michael Jansen
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.25
Murray Jansen
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.24
Janet Mills
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.23
Dayna Porter
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.19
Kyra John
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.14
Ramon Tuason
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.10
Heidi Kjos
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.09
Teufelin Traylen
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
John Hapke
81W–77L career
0%97%2%
3.32
3.5
Lynne Nieda
62W–51L career
0%99%1%
3.31
3.5
Pete Kovalenko
24W–28L career
1%98%1%
3.29
3.5
Michael Jansen
27W–55L career
2%97%1%
3.25
3.5
Murray Jansen
38W–63L career
1%98%1%
3.25
3.5
Janet Mills
66W–75L career
1%99%0%
3.24
3.5
Dayna Porter
81W–74L career
2%98%0%
3.23
3.5
Kyra John
42W–40L career
3%97%0%
3.19
3.5
Ramon Tuason
59W–74L career
8%92%0%
3.14
3.5
Heidi Kjos
74W–115L career
12%88%0%
3.10
3.5
Teufelin Traylen
77W–65L career
12%88%0%
3.09

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.