Search

Alexandra Lee

Portland, OR
3.5C year-end 2025
45 matches · 32W–13L · seasons 20202026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.25
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 12 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
100%
stay 3.5
0%
up to 4.0

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the middle of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Portland · 3.5
198 of 399
OR · 3.5
390 of 735

Alexandra is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Teams18 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Alexandra has been a steady 3.5 across all 7 seasons on record.

3.03.52020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2021 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Alexandra has gone from the 86th to the 66th percentile of players at that level, 2022 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
3.5
78.6%
22W–6L · 58.7% of games
7.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
54.5%
6W–5L · 55.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history45 matches
L
Abby Hata / Dan Valenciamixed
2026-07-19 · MAC-Leedy · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Richard Sohn
+0.000below expectation — took 20% of games against 34% expected
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-06-28 · MAC-Leedy · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tuan Truong
+0.000better than expected — took 57% of games against 45% expected
6-4, 7-6
L
2026-06-21 · NOR-MAC-Lamprecht · #3 Doubles · with Andrea Lamprecht
0.000about as expected — took 50% of games against 49% expected
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-19 · NOR-MAC-Lamprecht · #2 Doubles · with Desiree Bliss
+0.010about as expected — took 48% of games against 46% expected
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-14 · NOR-MAC-Lamprecht · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christy MacColl
+0.037better than expected — took 86% of games against 62% expected
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-05-30 · NOR-MAC-Lamprecht · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tove Maloco
0.060below expectation — took 20% of games against 51% expected
6-0, 6-3
L
2026-04-18 · NOR-MAC-Lamprecht · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jill Eilers
+0.004about as expected — took 45% of games against 43% expected
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-10 · NOR-MAC-Lamprecht · #3 Doubles · with Desiree Bliss
+0.010about as expected — took 38% of games against 37% expected
3-6, 6-0, 1-0
W
2026-02-21 · MAC-Lamprecht/Cofield · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Desiree Bliss
+0.020better than expected — took 65% of games against 54% expected
6-1, 7-6
W
2026-01-17 · MAC-Lamprecht/Cofield · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Desiree Bliss
0.016about as expected — took 59% of games against 63% expected
6-4, 7-5
W
2025-09-28 · MAC-Leedy/Davis · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tove Maloco
+0.042better than expected — took 80% of games against 56% expected
6-1, 6-2
W
2025-09-14 · MAC-Leedy/Davis · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tove Maloco
0.015below expectation — took 44% of games against 53% expected
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.