Teams

MAC-Leedy

2026 Mixed 40 & Over · 7.0 Mixed

12 players · average NTRP 3.54 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.30 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.84
Alex Young
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.44
Tove Maloco
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.41
Katie Jurgenson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.36
Andrea Lamprecht
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.27
Alejandro Kitzis
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.25
Alexandra Lee
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.24
Tuan Truong
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.20
Rudy Martinez
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.19
Richard Sohn
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.18
Zachary Wright
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.12
Derek Lamprecht
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.06
Catherine Leedy
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Alex Young
42W–22L career
0%96%4%
3.84
3.5
Tove Maloco
86W–43L career
0%92%8%
3.44
3.5
Katie Jurgenson
84W–60L career
0%94%6%
3.41
3.5
Andrea Lamprecht
55W–48L career
0%97%3%
3.36
3.5
Alejandro Kitzis
45W–35L career
1%99%0%
3.27
3.5
Alexandra Lee
32W–13L career
2%98%1%
3.25
3.5
Tuan Truong
30W–64L career
1%98%0%
3.24
3.5
Rudy Martinez
45W–105L career
2%98%0%
3.20
3.5
Richard Sohn
64W–65L career
3%97%0%
3.19
3.5
Zachary Wright
177W–141L career
3%97%0%
3.18
3.5
Derek Lamprecht
28W–27L career
13%87%0%
3.12
3.5
Catherine Leedy
86W–119L career
19%81%0%
3.06

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.