← Teams

MAC-Caldicott/Eckelman

2025 Mixed 40 & Over · 7.0 Mixed

9 players · average NTRP 3.22 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.00 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.30
Jesse Inkpen
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.29
Rebecca van Sickle
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.09
Nicolle Lochner
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.05
Vivian Krupicka
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
3.01
Kathleen Cooney
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.86
Matthew Casimo
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.83
Barbra Jorgensen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.77
Sara Weinstein
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.75
Fergus Caldicott
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
Results8 ties
2025-08-09Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesKristin Eckelman / Fergus Caldicott vs Judith Kobin / Matt Thayer6-0, 6-3
L#2 DoublesJesse Inkpen / Nicolle Lochner vs Jen Lewis / Octavian Tudorache6-2, 6-0
L#3 DoublesVivian Krupicka / Bruce Landrey vs Caryn Cohen / Tony Moreno6-1, 6-1
2025-07-27Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesMark Christensen / Nicolle Lochner vs Janet Ha / Jungyoon Kim6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesMatthew Casimo / Sara Weinstein vs Mihye Ko / Robert Truong6-1, 6-0
L#3 DoublesJesse Inkpen / Kathleen Cooney vs Yongseok Cheon / Seungja Shin6-0, 6-4
2025-07-26Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesMark Christensen / Nicolle Lochner vs Duncan Sharkey / Puntrigar Suriyaseang6-1, 6-0
L#2 DoublesMatthew Casimo / Kathleen Cooney vs Michael Won / Christina Bergstrom6-2, 6-4
2025-07-20Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesFergus Caldicott / Vivian Krupicka vs Andrea Kropp / John Nguyen6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesKathleen Cooney / Matthew Casimo vs Donna Baxter / Ray Baxter6-3, 6-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesBruce Landrey / Barbra Jorgensen vs ROSY ALANIS / ALFREDO ALANIS6-3, 6-0
2025-07-19Split 1–1
L#1 DoublesMatthew Casimo / Sara Weinstein vs Maria Kosmetatos / Todd Khozein6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesBruce Landrey / Vivian Krupicka vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-07-13Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesKathleen Cooney / Jesse Inkpen vs Lamone Voravongseng / Kathy Cook6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesFergus Caldicott / Kristin Eckelman vs Patrick Morrissey / Yan Morrissey4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMatthew Casimo / Barbra Jorgensen vs Tommy Atkins / Julie Ahn6-2, 6-4
2025-06-28Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesNicolle Lochner / Mark Christensen vs Huy Bui / HOLLY LIBERATORE6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesVivian Krupicka / Jesse Inkpen vs Joel Fine / Thu Truong6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesFergus Caldicott / Sara Weinstein vs Peter Farrelly / Gabriela McIntosh6-1, 6-2
2025-06-22Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesFergus Caldicott / Rebecca van Sickle vs Barbara Gram / Chresten Gram6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesMatthew Casimo / Vivian Krupicka vs Scott Holland / Alice Holland6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesJesse Inkpen / Barbra Jorgensen vs Eric Schniewind / Nicole Norby7-5, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Jesse Inkpen
45W–61L career
1%97%2%
3.30
3.5
Rebecca van Sickle
18W–16L career
2%95%3%
3.29
3.5
Nicolle Lochner
36W–73L career
25%74%1%
3.09
3
Vivian Krupicka
11W–9L career
0%65%35%
3.05
3.5
Kathleen Cooney
47W–71L career
31%69%0%
3.01
3
Matthew Casimo
40W–103L career
0%98%2%
2.86
3
Barbra Jorgensen
20W–30L career
2%92%7%
2.83
3
Sara Weinstein
12W–27L career
1%98%1%
2.77
3
Fergus Caldicott
10W–32L career
1%99%0%
2.75

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.