← Search

Lara Greenberg

Portland, OR
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
124 matches · 79W–45L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Lara Greenberg to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history124 matches
L
2026-09-13 · SAC-Smith · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jonathan Chun mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-08-14 · #1 Doubles · with Daniel Rousseau championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-6
W
2026-08-09 · SAC-Wang/Watson · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Daniel Rousseau mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-08-08 · SAC-Boyce · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Martin von Haartman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-08-05 · Greenberg Koeberl · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Grainne Koeberl
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
L
2026-08-03 · Greenberg Koeberl · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Grainne Koeberl
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-7, 0-1
W
2026-08-01 · SAC-Wang/Watson · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Daniel Rousseau mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 7-5
L
2026-07-29 · Greenberg Koeberl · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Grainne Koeberl
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-27 · Greenberg Koeberl · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Grainne Koeberl
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-26 · Greenberg Koeberl · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Grainne Koeberl
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-07-25 · SAC-Wang/Watson · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Nathan Watson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-07-25 · Greenberg Koeberl · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Grainne Koeberl
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams31 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
72.2%
39W–15L · 60.8% of games
3.5
43.5%
10W–13L · 48.9% of games
0.0mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
75%
18W–6L · 58.8% of games
7.0mixed
50%
8W–8L · 50% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 52% of the time
#1 Doubles
52%
65 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
23 matches
#1 Singles
14%
18 matches
#2 Doubles
12%
15 matches
#1 Female Doubles
2%
2 matches
#1 Mixed Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe