Search

Janice Hazel

Lake Oswego, OR
3.0C year-end 2025
106 matches · 46W–60L · seasons 20212026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.77
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 20 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
100%
stay 3.0
0%
up to 3.5

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the middle of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Lake Oswego · 3.0
33 of 52
OR · 3.0
396 of 600

Janice is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Teams27 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Janice has played at 2.5, 3.0 across 6 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

2.02.53.0202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2021, 2022 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Janice has gone from the 11th to the 31st percentile of players at that level, 2025 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
2.5
60.7%
17W–11L · 56.9% of games
3.0
38.5%
15W–24L · 42.8% of games
6.0
55.6%
5W–4L · 56.1% of games
7.0
0%
0W–4L · 12.7% of games
6.0mixed
28.6%
4W–10L · 37.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history106 matches
L
2026-07-26 · Panwhar Hazel · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Samina Panwhar
0.001below expectation — took 20% of games against 30% expected
6-2, 6-1
W
Dallas Jessup / Ryann Hulme
2026-07-24 · Panwhar Hazel · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with June Xiao
+0.012better than expected — took 67% of games against 59% expected
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-06-19 · Panwhar Hazel · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Elizabeth Yutan
0.027below expectation — took 0% of games against 27% expected
6-0, 6-0
W
Elena Rotondi / Maria Rivero-Gore
2026-06-14 · MPRC-Amarga-Lee · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lee Gates
0.005about as expected — took 58% of games against 59% expected
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
Nozomi Bray / Jennifer Yamin
2026-06-13 · Panwhar Hazel · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Samina Panwhar
+0.077better than expected — took 80% of games against 42% expected
6-0, 6-3
L
2026-06-07 · MPRC-Amarga-Lee · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Samina Panwhar
0.010below expectation — took 25% of games against 36% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
Mindy Chin / Theresa Hagerty
2026-05-22 · MPRC-Amarga-Lee · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Laura Davies
0.026below expectation — took 33% of games against 47% expected
6-2, 6-4
L
Susan Thomashow / Barbara Maughanchamps
2026-05-21 · MPRC-Amarga-Lee · #2 Doubles · with Carol Bremner
0.008about as expected — took 42% of games against 46% expected
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
Nancy McCoy / Tomoko Langworthy
2026-03-20 · NOR-MPRC-Turchi · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Susan Bradley
+0.035better than expected — took 65% of games against 48% expected
6-1, 7-6
W
2026-02-08 · MPRC-Amarga-Lee · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Leanne Kong
0.010below expectation — took 48% of games against 54% expected
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
Jennifer Tobin / Manisha Thakkar
2026-01-30 · MPRC-Amarga-Lee · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Samina Panwhar
+0.031better than expected — took 57% of games against 43% expected
7-6, 6-4
W
2026-01-03 · MPRC-Amarga-Lee · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Samina Panwhar
+0.033better than expected — took 67% of games against 50% expected
6-3, 6-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.