← Search

Dipali Dixit

Lake Oswego, OR
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
89 matches · 41W–48L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Dipali Dixit to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history89 matches
W
2026-09-13 · MPRC-Tompkins/Hazel · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Janice Hazel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-01-11 · N OR-MPRC-Mitchell · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer Weaver
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2025-06-22 · MPRC-Hua/Clark · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Stephanie Hoover
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
W
2025-06-07 · MPRC-Hua/Clark · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer Weaver
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
L
2025-05-24 · WHRC-Webb · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Manoj Agnihotri mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
L
2025-05-10 · WHRC-Webb · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Manoj Agnihotri mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 1-6
L
2025-03-15 · WHRC-Webb · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Manoj Agnihotri mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2025-03-02 · MPRC-Brinck/Dixit · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nicole Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L
2025-02-23 · MPRC-Brinck/Dixit · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer Weaver
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2025-02-15 · MPRC-Brinck/Dixit · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kate Elliott
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2025-01-24 · MPRC-Brinck/Dixit · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nicole Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2025-01-04 · MPRC-Brinck/Dixit · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer Weaver
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams28 teams · 2012–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
55.2%
32W–26L · 54.5% of games
3.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
42.9%
6W–8L · 50.8% of games
7.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 45% of the time
#2 Doubles
45%
40 matches
#1 Doubles
30%
27 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
22 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer