Search

Shelly Bigley

Portland, OR
3.0C year-end 2024
96 matches · 46W–50L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.80
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 4 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
99%
stay 3.0
1%
up to 3.5

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the middle of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Portland · 3.0
210 of 357
OR · 3.0
352 of 600

Shelly is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Shelly has been a steady 3.0 across all 7 seasons on record.

2.53.02019202020212022202320242026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2026 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Shelly has gone from the 85th to the 55th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2024.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level6 levels played
3.0
61.8%
34W–21L · 55.6% of games
3.5
27.8%
5W–13L · 41.1% of games
6.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
40%
2W–3L · 48.1% of games
7.0mixed
36.4%
4W–7L · 49.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history96 matches
L
2026-06-14 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Elizabeth Large
+0.010about as expected — took 39% of games against 37% expected
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
Anna Kim / Nicole Alvarez
2026-05-29 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Dara Abraham
+0.025better than expected — took 57% of games against 46% expected
6-4, 7-6
W
2026-05-23 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Elizabeth Large
+0.034better than expected — took 59% of games against 44% expected
7-5, 6-4
L
Crystal Ounaphom / Sandra Miller
2026-05-08 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Elena Rotondi
0.021below expectation — took 29% of games against 42% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
2024-06-15 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cathy Koerner
+0.006about as expected — took 40% of games against 39% expected
6-0, 2-6, 1-0
L
2024-05-31 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Angie Cunningham
+0.025better than expected — took 56% of games against 43% expected
0-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2024-05-10 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Gretchen Sturm
+0.033better than expected — took 71% of games against 53% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
2024-05-05 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jacquelyn Miller
0.002below expectation — took 25% of games against 33% expected
6-4, 6-0
L
Sarah Larson / Bernice Zhang
2024-05-04 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Catherine Leedy
0.010below expectation — took 35% of games against 42% expected
7-5, 6-2
L
2024-04-27 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jacquelyn Miller
0.020below expectation — took 29% of games against 42% expected
6-2, 6-3
W
Sarah Felker / Elisa Wickstrom
2024-04-13 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jacquelyn Miller
0.009about as expected — took 63% of games against 63% expected
6-4, 6-3
W
Stefanie Hetland / Stephanie Harbell
2024-03-30 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Molly Hisatomi
+0.030better than expected — took 65% of games against 50% expected
6-2, 7-5
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.