Search

Tamara Phillips

Vancouver, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
194 matches · 65W–129L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.58
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 16 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
17%
down to 2.5
83%
stay 3.0
0%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 10% down · 90% stay · 0% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.60. Higher than today’s 2.58 because players this far below their band have historically finished nearer the middle of it.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the bottom of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Vancouver · 3.0
50 of 52
WA · 3.0
744 of 755

Tamara is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Teams115 teams · 2001–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Tamara has played at 3.5, 3.0 across 8 seasons — 0 moves up and 1 down.

2.53.03.520192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 6.0, Tamara has gone from the 18th to the 21st percentile of players at that level, 2023 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level6 levels played
3.0
36.6%
15W–26L · 46% of games
3.5
25.9%
14W–40L · 39.6% of games
6.0
35.7%
10W–18L · 45.8% of games
7.0
25%
5W–15L · 44.2% of games
6.0mixed
55.6%
15W–12L · 50.6% of games
7.0mixed
26.1%
6W–17L · 40% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history194 matches
L
Lindsay Jenkins / Calvin Hsiehmixed
2026-07-26 · VTC-Brown/Olson · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Edward Travalia
+0.000better than expected — took 52% of games against 38% expected
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
Chris Martell / Karin Owensmixed
2026-07-19 · VTC-Brown/Olson · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Robert More
+0.000better than expected — took 71% of games against 50% expected
6-2, 6-3
W
Lori Andersen / Rodney Johnsonmixed
2026-05-17 · NOR-VTC-Olson · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Frank Brown
+0.000better than expected — took 71% of games against 59% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-05-09 · NOR-VTC-Olson · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Todd Berinstein
+0.000below expectation — took 25% of games against 38% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
Judy Friedman / Barbara Maughan
2026-05-08 · CGM-Pasmore/Weyand · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Tomoko Langworthy
0.018below expectation — took 29% of games against 41% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-03-14 · CGM-Watson/Dolbey · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Donna Weyand
0.049below expectation — took 8% of games against 38% expected
6-0, 6-1
L
Sally Papadimas / Jeanne McGinnis
2026-03-12 · CGM-Pasmore/Weyand · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Donna Weyand
+0.026better than expected — took 52% of games against 40% expected
2-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-03-08 · CGM-Watson/Dolbey · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Donna Weyand
0.029below expectation — took 20% of games against 39% expected
6-3, 6-0
L
Jill Otermat / Mindy Chin
2026-01-24 · CGM-Watson/Dolbey · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Linda Coburn
+0.002about as expected — took 50% of games against 48% expected
5-7, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-01-11 · CGM-Watson/Dolbey · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Linda Coburn
+0.010about as expected — took 57% of games against 52% expected
7-6, 6-4
L
Laura Baughman / Christina Gross
2026-01-03 · CGM-Watson/Dolbey · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Donna Weyand
0.016below expectation — took 37% of games against 46% expected
6-4, 6-3
L
2025-10-25 · CGM-Watson/Perlmutter · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Tomoko Langworthy
0.013below expectation — took 29% of games against 40% expected
6-2, 6-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.