← Search

Tamara Phillips

Vancouver, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
195 matches · 66W–129L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Tamara Phillips to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history195 matches
W
2026-08-01 · VTC-Brown/Olson · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Robert More mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-26 · VTC-Brown/Olson · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Edward Travalia mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-7, 0-1
W
2026-07-19 · VTC-Brown/Olson · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Robert More mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-05-17 · NOR-VTC-Olson · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Frank Brown mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-05-09 · NOR-VTC-Olson · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Todd Berinstein mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-08 · CGM-Pasmore/Weyand · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Tomoko Langworthy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-03-14 · CGM-Watson/Dolbey · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Donna Weyand
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-03-12 · CGM-Pasmore/Weyand · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Donna Weyand
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 5-7, 0-1
L
2026-03-08 · CGM-Watson/Dolbey · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Donna Weyand
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
L
2026-01-24 · CGM-Watson/Dolbey · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Linda Coburn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-01-11 · CGM-Watson/Dolbey · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Linda Coburn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
L
2026-01-03 · CGM-Watson/Dolbey · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Donna Weyand
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams116 teams · 2001–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
36.6%
15W–26L · 46% of games
3.5
25.9%
14W–40L · 39.6% of games
6.0
35.7%
10W–18L · 45.8% of games
7.0
25%
5W–15L · 44.2% of games
6.0mixed
57.1%
16W–12L · 50.7% of games
7.0mixed
26.1%
6W–17L · 40% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 43% of the time
#3 Doubles
43%
84 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
64 matches
#1 Doubles
24%
47 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams