Search

Julie Dicks

Portland, OR
3.0C year-end 2025
52 matches · 27W–25L · seasons 20202026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.82
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 14 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
99%
stay 3.0
1%
up to 3.5

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the upper half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Portland · 3.0
194 of 357
OR · 3.0
329 of 600

Julie is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Julie has been 3.0 for all 7 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the middle.

2.53.02020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2020, 2021, 2022 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Julie has gone from the 51st to the 91st percentile of players at that level, 2025 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
2.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.0
65.6%
21W–11L · 56% of games
6.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
26.7%
4W–11L · 43.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history52 matches
L
Tricia Wimmer / Autumn Bunch
2026-07-28 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sarah Cariaga
0.051below expectation — took 29% of games against 55% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
Azure Olson / Luc Boudreaumixed
2026-07-18 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Matt Vuylsteke
+0.000about as expected — took 46% of games against 42% expected
7-6, 6-5
W
Kelly Powers / Kimberly Wisniewski
2026-07-15 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kari Court
+0.054better than expected — took 92% of games against 60% expected
6-0, 6-1
L
Tricia Wimmer / Autumn Bunch
2026-06-29 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Cierra Speck
0.032below expectation — took 41% of games against 55% expected
6-4, 7-5
L
Shuping Li / Ying Deng
2026-06-16 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sarah Cariaga
0.017below expectation — took 47% of games against 54% expected
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W
Theresa Hagerty / Mindy Chin
2026-06-06 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lori Peterson
+0.003about as expected — took 65% of games against 61% expected
7-5, 6-2
W
N/A
2026-05-30 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Stephany Mo
+0.060better than expected — took 100% of games against 62% expected
6-0, 6-0
W
Luz Zanavich / Virginia Welch
2026-05-17 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lori Peterson
+0.033better than expected — took 86% of games against 63% expected
6-0, 6-2
W
Martha Tolentino / Elena Walker
2026-05-10 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lori Peterson
0.008about as expected — took 58% of games against 60% expected
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-03-14 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Stephany Mo
+0.049better than expected — took 92% of games against 62% expected
6-0, 6-1
W
Lindsay Jenkins / Carol Glenn
2026-02-07 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lori Peterson
+0.005about as expected — took 57% of games against 54% expected
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W
Rubyca Jaai / Sun Oh
2026-01-09 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Heather Davidson
+0.062better than expected — took 75% of games against 44% expected
6-4, 6-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.