Search

Donna Weyand

Vancouver, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
114 matches · 42W–72L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.68
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 18 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
1%
down to 2.5
99%
stay 3.0
0%
up to 3.5

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the lower half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Vancouver · 3.0
41 of 52
WA · 3.0
705 of 755

Donna is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Donna has played at 3.5, 3.0 across 5 seasons — 0 moves up and 1 down.

2.53.03.520192020202220232026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 6.0, Donna has gone from the 55th to the 27th percentile of players at that level, 2024 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level7 levels played
0.0
57.1%
12W–9L · 54.2% of games
3.0
29.2%
7W–17L · 43% of games
3.5
30.8%
4W–9L · 42.3% of games
6.0
40%
8W–12L · 47.7% of games
7.0
27.6%
8W–21L · 42.3% of games
6.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 49.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history114 matches
W
Robbi Matarrese / Ann Davidson
2026-07-29 · #3 Doubles · 0.0 · with Janel Mussman
0.018below expectation — took 43% of games against 53% expected
1-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
Jeanne McGinnis / Debbie Ackroyd
2026-06-18 · #3 Doubles · 0.0 · with Janel Mussman
+0.049better than expected — took 86% of games against 58% expected
6-1, 6-1
L
Mary Jane Toolson / Anne Walsh
2026-06-04 · #3 Doubles · 0.0 · with Barbara Pasmore
+0.055better than expected — took 42% of games against 25% expected
7-5, 7-5
L
Bonnie Briggs-Ramm / Judy van Gasse
2026-05-13 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tuni Stecker
+0.054better than expected — took 41% of games against 25% expected
6-4, 7-5
L
Elizabeth Kaufman / Theresa Go
2026-04-30 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Amy Hicks
0.029below expectation — took 29% of games against 45% expected
6-1, 6-4
L
Sandra Seyler / Vicki Blunt
2026-03-19 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Linda Underwood
0.030below expectation — took 8% of games against 32% expected
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-03-14 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tamara Phillips
0.049below expectation — took 8% of games against 38% expected
6-0, 6-1
L
Sally Papadimas / Jeanne McGinnis
2026-03-12 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Tamara Phillips
+0.026better than expected — took 52% of games against 40% expected
2-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-03-08 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tamara Phillips
0.029below expectation — took 20% of games against 39% expected
6-3, 6-0
L
Karoline Brock / Shannon Wagner
2026-02-07 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lynda Borja
0.000about as expected — took 44% of games against 44% expected
7-5, 7-6
L
Delia Mcqueen / Debbie Fitzpatrick
2026-01-24 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nancy Lowenberg
0.041below expectation — took 28% of games against 49% expected
7-5, 6-0
L
2026-01-11 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tomoko Langworthy
0.003about as expected — took 41% of games against 43% expected
6-1, 3-6, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.