← Search

Debbie Ackroyd

Portland, OR
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
93 matches · 40W–53L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Debbie Ackroyd to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history93 matches
W
2026-07-31 · MAC-Lekas/Nichols · #3 Doubles · 0.0 · with Julie Nichols
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-07-21 · MAC-Lekas/Nichols · #3 Doubles · 0.0 · with Peg McClendon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
Janel Mussman / Donna Weyand
2026-06-18 · MAC-Lekas/Nichols · #3 Doubles · 0.0 · with Jeanne McGinnis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-04 · MAC-Lekas/Nichols · #3 Doubles · 0.0 · with Ellen Wood
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
L
2026-04-30 · MAC-Ackroyd · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jeanne McGinnis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-04-17 · MAC-Ackroyd · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Holly Lekas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-7
L
2026-04-02 · MAC-Ackroyd · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Holly Lekas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-03-20 · MAC-Ackroyd · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Holly Lekas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-03-12 · MAC-Ackroyd · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Holly Lekas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2025-05-15 · MAC-Lekas/Mangan · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jean Jensen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L
2025-05-13 · MAC-Lekas/Mangan · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Holly Lekas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
W
2025-04-10 · MAC-Lekas/Mangan · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Holly Lekas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams21 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
0.0
23.1%
3W–10L · 35% of games
3.0
43.5%
10W–13L · 50.4% of games
6.0
46.7%
21W–24L · 47.3% of games
6.0mixed
50%
6W–6L · 45.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 50% of the time
#3 Doubles
50%
46 matches
#2 Doubles
40%
37 matches
#1 Doubles
11%
10 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe