← Search

Holly Lekas

Portland, OR
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
83 matches · 32W–51L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Holly Lekas to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history83 matches
L
2026-08-06 · MAC-Lekas/Nichols · #2 Doubles · 0.0 · with Laura Walker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-23 · MAC-Ackroyd · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Anne Mangan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-04-17 · MAC-Ackroyd · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Debbie Ackroyd
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-7
L
2026-04-02 · MAC-Ackroyd · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Debbie Ackroyd
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-03-20 · MAC-Ackroyd · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Debbie Ackroyd
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-03-12 · MAC-Ackroyd · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Debbie Ackroyd
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2025-05-15 · MAC-Lekas/Mangan · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Anne Mangan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
L
2025-05-13 · MAC-Lekas/Mangan · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Debbie Ackroyd
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2025-05-08 · MAC-Lekas/Mangan · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Deborah Wood
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2025-04-18 · MAC-Lekas/Mangan · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Deborah Wood
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
W
2025-04-10 · MAC-Lekas/Mangan · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Debbie Ackroyd
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2025-03-27 · MAC-Lekas/Mangan · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Nancy Haller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams18 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
0.0
10%
1W–9L · 30.7% of games
2.5
60%
3W–2L · 56.8% of games
3.0
11.1%
1W–8L · 32.9% of games
6.0
44.9%
22W–27L · 47.1% of games
6.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 56% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 40% of the time
#3 Doubles
40%
33 matches
#2 Doubles
39%
32 matches
#1 Doubles
22%
18 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams