Search

Julia Rea

Lake Oswego, OR
3.5C year-end 2025
61 matches · 23W–38L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.19
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 5 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
1%
down to 3.0
99%
stay 3.5
0%
up to 4.0

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the lower half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Lake Oswego · 3.5
42 of 60
OR · 3.5
511 of 735

Julia is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
How you rank at your level

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level6 levels played
0.0
44.4%
4W–5L · 49.1% of games
3.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
6.0
75%
3W–1L · 55.4% of games
7.0
19%
4W–17L · 38.7% of games
8.0
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
42.1%
8W–11L · 48% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history61 matches
L
2026-06-25 · #1 Doubles · 0.0 · with Patty Mamula
0.006below expectation — took 25% of games against 35% expected
6-0, 6-4
W
Cathryn Todd / Claire C Gates
2026-06-04 · #1 Doubles · 0.0 · with Gwen van Meter
+0.027better than expected — took 86% of games against 65% expected
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-04-23 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Candy Dann
0.037below expectation — took 33% of games against 52% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-04-23 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Julia Zhu
0.013below expectation — took 33% of games against 42% expected
6-4, 6-2
L
Anna Maria Savinar / Anne Fernando
2026-03-24 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Marilyn Bishop
0.029below expectation — took 41% of games against 54% expected
6-1, 3-6, 1-0
L
2025-04-22 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Gwen van Meter
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L
2025-04-16 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Carilyn Alexander
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
6-4, 6-1
L
2025-03-18 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Fran Hepp
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
6-1, 6-0
L
Kathleen Schlickeiser / Judy Orlandini
2025-03-13 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kristi Tompkins
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
6-0, 6-4
W
Jodi Berg / Patti Youngrenchamps
2024-09-12 · #2 Doubles · with Fran Hepp
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
6-1, 6-2
L
2024-08-26 · #1 Doubles · 0.0 · with Patty Mamula
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
6-3, 6-1
L
Adele Bostwick / Kathy Watanabe
2024-07-19 · #2 Doubles · 0.0 · with Dorothy Rodegerdts
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
6-1, 6-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.