Search

Cathryn Todd

Portland, OR
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
54 matches · 28W–26L · seasons 20202026

Captains: add Cathryn Todd to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history54 matches
L
2026-08-14 · PT&E-Todd/Harrold · #1 Doubles · 0.0 · with Claire C Gates
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-26 · PT&E-Todd/Harrold · #2 Doubles · 0.0 · with Lynda Borja
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-04 · PT&E-Todd/Harrold · #1 Doubles · 0.0 · with Claire C Gates
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-05-01 · NOR-PT&E/SJRC-Kirsch/Edwardsen · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Susan Thomashow
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-04-23 · NOR-PT&E/SJRC-Kirsch/Edwardsen · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jane Comerford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-04-17 · NOR-PT&E/SJRC-Kirsch/Edwardsen · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Claire C Gates
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-03-20 · NOR-PT&E/SJRC-Kirsch/Edwardsen · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Judy Friedman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
L
2025-10-25 · GLVR-Fisher · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Susan Block
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W
2025-10-11 · GLVR-Fisher · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Christine Egan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
L
2025-09-20 · GLVR-Fisher · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Claire C Gates
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
2025-09-12 · #3 Doubles · with Jane Comerford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W
2025-09-11 · #2 Doubles · with Judy Friedman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams14 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
0.0
35.3%
6W–11L · 46.5% of games
3.0
20%
1W–4L · 37.8% of games
6.0
81.8%
18W–4L · 61.9% of games
6.0mixed
25%
2W–6L · 47% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova