← Search

Jean Jensen

Portland, OR
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
110 matches · 57W–53L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jean Jensen to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history110 matches
L
2026-07-21 · MAC-Lekas/Nichols · #2 Doubles · 0.0 · with Jeanne McGinnis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-09 · MAC-Lekas/Nichols · #2 Doubles · 0.0 · with Julie Nichols
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-08 · MAC-Ackroyd · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Dorothy Cofield
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-04-30 · MAC-Ackroyd · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Sally Papadimas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-23 · MAC-Ackroyd · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Sally Papadimas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-04-17 · MAC-Ackroyd · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Amy Korkowski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-03-24 · MAC-Ackroyd · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Ellen Wood
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2025-08-21 · MAC-Rogovoy/Johnson · #1 Doubles · 0.0 · with Jeanne McGinnis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2025-07-24 · MAC-Rogovoy/Johnson · #3 Doubles · 0.0 · with Barbara Friesen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2025-07-17 · MAC-Rogovoy/Johnson · #1 Doubles · 0.0 · with Dorothy Cofield
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2025-06-12 · MAC-Rogovoy/Johnson · #2 Doubles · 0.0 · with Dorothy Cofield
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2025-05-15 · MAC-Lekas/Mangan · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Debbie Ackroyd
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams15 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
0.0
33.3%
7W–14L · 41.6% of games
3.0
57.1%
8W–6L · 52.9% of games
6.0
56.9%
33W–25L · 53.1% of games
7.0
66.7%
4W–2L · 55.2% of games
6.0mixed
80%
4W–1L · 55.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 57% of the time
#1 Doubles
57%
63 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
30 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
16 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova