← Search

Barbara Friesen

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Vancouver, WA
3.0S year-end 2025
i
Self-rated, or a medical appeal
37 matches · 11W–26L · seasons 2019–2025
Match history37 matches
W
2025-07-24 · MAC-Rogovoy/Johnson · #3 Doubles · 0.0 · with Jean Jensen
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-2
L
2025-07-17 · MAC-Rogovoy/Johnson · #3 Doubles · 0.0 · with Julie Yang
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 3-6
W
2025-06-20 · MAC-Rogovoy/Johnson · #3 Doubles · 0.0 · with Sandra Redding
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-6, 7-5
L
2024-08-15 · MAC-Rogovoy/Mesher · #2 Doubles · 0.0 · with Ellen Wood
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 0-6
L
2023-08-16 · MAC-Rogovoy/Mesher · #2 Doubles · 0.0 · with Marilyn Soljaga
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 1-6
L
2023-08-02 · MAC-Rogovoy/Mesher · #2 Doubles · 0.0 · with Debbie Ackroyd
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 3-6
L
2023-07-28 · MAC-Rogovoy/Mesher · #1 Doubles · 0.0 · with Marilyn Soljaga
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 0-6
L
2023-06-14 · MAC-Rogovoy/Mesher · #2 Doubles · 0.0 · with Sandra Redding
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 3-6
L
2022-11-05 · MAC-Walker/Korkowski · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Melanie Morris
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 2-6
L
2022-10-22 · MAC-Walker/Korkowski · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Barbara Mesher
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 2-6
L
2022-10-09 · MAC-Walker/Korkowski · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Marcy Patton
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2022-10-02 · MAC-Walker/Korkowski · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Julie Yang
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams11 teams · 2019–2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
0.0
20%
2W–8L · 32.1% of games
3.0
50%
4W–4L · 51.1% of games
6.0
26.3%
5W–14L · 43.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 51% of the time
#2 Doubles
51%
19 matches
#3 Doubles
38%
14 matches
#1 Doubles
11%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert